Dear Authors, Dear GodParents,

   I have read the ggMET GMSB draft v2 and it is in a very good shape - I
have just few minor comments/suggestions, please see below (I've also
attached a text file).

==> Thank you.

   I also went through the document describing the changes - thanks, that's
a nice summary and it explains well what was done. SPRG folks did a great
job spotting the feature - thanks to the authors for addressing the
comment.

==> Thank you.

Best Regards,
                     andrey


=======================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------
Andrey Loginov's comments to the draft v2.0 of ggMET paper
-----------------------------------------------------------


Please note that all my english-related comments are up to our
literary GP and the authors ...

-----------------------------------------------------------
text
-----------------------------------------------------------

== page 1

P1L38
X denote -> X denotes

==> Done.

P1L39
particle -> particles

==> Done.

P1L80

You reference triggers described in the gg+X note, although the
triggers are slightly different (unless I misremember): you have two
extra triggers compared to the diphoton triggers used in gg+X. Suggest
to say this or to reference Eunsin's thesis as it probably contains
all the relevant details.

==> Done.

== page 2

P2L7
change -> recalculate

==> Done.

P2L7
the photon $E_T$ -> the 4-momenta of photons
(or something similar to clarify that you recalculate E_T's of both
photons...

==> Done.

P2L19
detector. -> detector (from the more intense p beam)
(well, it used to be like this before - it's up to you if you want to
keep it the way it is now.)

==> Done.

P2L26
Suggest to reference the METMODEL here? (Ref.15)

==> The METMODEL was referenced in it's first appearance (line 46 in page 1). 
We originally had this, but we're asked to remove this here from SPRG. 

P2L34
$\met$ (...). -> $\met$, ... (add comma, remove brackets)

==> Done.

P2L60
can also give rise -> can also produce
(sounds simpler/clearer in my opinion, but this is up to the authors)

==> Done.

P2L69
is there a space between the "W" and the comma right after it?

==> NO sapce at all.

P2L106
the parton... -> parton...

==> Done.

== page 3

P3L48
add comma after 149 $GeV/c^2$

==> Done.

== page 4

P4 Figure 3

add tilde (~) on top of neutralino on the Y-axis (neutralino lifetime)

==>Good catch. Fixed.


=======================================================================

Best Regards,
  Andrey Loginov